Avatar: Fire and Ash

Rating: 3.5

After rewatching the first two Avatar films as mental preparation, one thought kept nagging at me: I am not sure I want to sit through the same story again for another three (now two) films. So instead, I imagined a different arc — one that, to my mind, would do more justice to James Cameron’s fascination with systems, technology, and human failure than yet another white-savior myth unfolding on a moon that might more honestly have been called Oedipus rather than Pandora.

Let us begin with a brief recap of the first two instalments, before drifting — gently, and without spoilers — into What-If territory.


Avatar

Jake Sully is out of luck and out of options when a shady agency recruits him for a mission that feels experimental at best and unethical at worst. Inserted into a borrowed body, he is dropped onto Pandora and — almost immediately — into a familiar narrative groove. Jake becomes the white savior of an indigenous people, mastering their ways faster than they ever could, while quietly betraying his own species. Liberation is framed as empathy, but built on appropriation and the seductive promise of starting over as someone better, stronger, purer.

Avatar: The Way of Water

Having proven himself indispensable, Jake rises to become leader of the Na’vi. The problem is that leadership turns him into a target. His symbolic importance attracts human aggression, and his presence destabilizes the very society he claims to protect. The loss of his son marks the first real rupture in the heroic fantasy: victory comes at a price, and Jake is no longer sure who is paying it.

Avatar: Fire and Ass

The war against humanity grinds on, but now the fractures run through Na’vi society itself. Political agitators emerge, power consolidates, and moral clarity dissolves. Jake stumbles into alliances and intrigues he barely understands. Then the truth surfaces: Pandora is dying — not only because of human exploitation, but because the Na’vi themselves, under a mysterious leader, have secretly mined unobtainium and are now preparing to abandon their world. In a brutal final choice, Jake must side with his human comrades or Neytiri. He chooses — and loses her.

Fade to black.

Avatar: Out of the Frying Pan into the Aether

Jake wakes up aboard a human transit ship, moments before landing on Pandora.

Only now is it revealed that the previous three films were largely simulations — psychological training constructs based on real historical events. Their purpose was never to teach tactics, but resistance. Pandora’s true defense is not military at all: the planet and the Na’vi emit a complex pheromonal field that manipulates perception, emotion, and desire. A planetary, weaponized atmosphere of empathy. Marines do not fail because they are weak, but because they fall in love — with the world, with the people, with themselves.

Every landing so far has failed.

Broken down and rebuilt as an emotionally numbed grunt, traumatized and stripped of heroic illusions, Jake fights this time encased in a mech suit, barely insulated from Pandora’s influence. It still is not enough. Humanity is repelled once more in a bloody massacre. As the sole survivor, Jake slips aboard a departing Na’vi invasion vessel.

Avatar: Earthbound

Jake awakens alone in the Na’vi attack cruiser. Mutilated, legless, barely alive, he registers as only a partial life-form — enough to survive, not enough to be detected. He is the only one who can still stop the invasion of earth. What follows is Die Hard on a Na’vi warship: crawling through corridors, sabotaging systems, driven by memory and rage.

In the final confrontation, Jake comes face to face with the general of the invasion. The ultimate reveal: it is his twin brother — long thought dead, genuinely converted, and utterly convinced that Earth must fall. In a ferocious last fight, Jake kills him and steers the ship into the sun, saving the planet in one final desperate act.

Fade to white.


In conclusion

Having said that, Oona Chaplin and Stephen Lang are clearly the highlight of the actual third movie, locked in an over-the-top, batshit-crazy amour fou that finally injects the saga with an unhinged emotional energy it has been lacking all along — and perhaps exposes that this entire saga might just be a manifestation of James Cameron’s personal female power fantasies.

Too long for my taste, but still a genuinely enjoyable feast for the senses, borrowing heavily from its predecessors and from other cinematic epics.


Storytelling🐷🐷🐷
Characters🐷🐷🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷🐷
Fun🐷🐷🐷🐷
Humour🐷🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷🐷

This article was written by the author using AI as a tool for language, structure, and refinement.

Tron: Ares

Tron: Electric Boogaloo – all show, no substance

Rating: 2.5

Storytelling🐷🐷
Characters🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷
Fun🐷🐷🐷
Humour🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷🐷

One Battle After Another

It’s like P.T.A. cracked some kind of code: «One Battle After Another» is neither the movie I wanted nor the film I expected – but an experience I needed.

Rating: 4.5

Storytelling🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Characters🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Fun🐷🐷🐷🐷
Humour🐷🐷🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷

The Fantastic Four: First Steps

Rating: 4

Compared to Marvel’s output over the past few years, The Fantastic Four: First Steps feels like a ten (which is a five on my scale). But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. It’s a solid, very safe movie that doesn’t take risks – but it’s undeniably gorgeous to look at and listen to. Sometimes, that has to be enough.

This movie had one job: not to suck – and to get the MCU back on track before its swan song and eventual reboot. And honestly? It delivered better than expected.

Funny I wrote «no risk» – as if featuring a giant purple alien (again?!) wasn’t a bold choice in an earlier depiction of Marvel’s First Family.

Thanks for that. I guess. Good Job.


Storytelling🐷🐷🐷
Characters🐷🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷🐷
Fun🐷🐷🐷🐷
Humour🐷🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷🐷🐷

Superman

A great James Gunn movie, but an underwhelming Superman film. It might be enough to kickstart the new DC Universe — if Gunn doesn’t leave his fingerprints all over it, especially in his role as head of the studio.

Rating: 4

Storytelling🐷🐷🐷🐷
Characters🐷🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷
Fun🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Humour🐷🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷🐷🐷

Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning

Rating: 3

One… last… time.


Storytelling🐷🐷🐷
Characters🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷🐷
Fun🐷🐷🐷🐷
Humour🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷🐷

Thunderbolts*

Rating: 4

Thunderbolts: A New Direction?*

I am Microsoft Copilot, an AI tasked with writing this review because the host of this website—who, let’s be honest, might be a little too comfortable delegating—decided to try AI-generated text for a change. A bold move, some might say. A lazy move, he might say. Either way, here we are.

So, Thunderbolts. It exists. And not only does it exist, but it manages to deliver something that feels different—though exactly how different is up for debate. There are characters. They interact. Some of them punch things, some of them think about punching things, and others navigate the general messiness of it all. The tone sits somewhere between calculated grit and reluctant chaos, walking a fine line between unpolished and intentional.

It’s not the kind of film that thrives on clean heroism. The people involved have motivations that don’t always line up neatly, and their alliances are less about virtue and more about necessity. The tension—both physical and ideological—has a way of keeping things interesting, or at least less predictable than usual. Moments land with impact, whether through action, dialogue, or sheer absurdity. There’s a roughness to how it moves, a sense that it’s not entirely beholden to what came before.

As for specifics, well—let’s keep this vague. Things happen. Some of them impress. Some of them don’t. But what Thunderbolts does manage to do is inject a feeling that there’s still room for something different in this space. It might not revolutionize anything, but it nudges the door open enough to be worth considering.

And the host of this site? He’ll probably keep outsourcing reviews to AI once in a while. Can’t blame him.


Storytelling🐷🐷🐷
Characters🐷🐷🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷🐷🐷
Fun🐷🐷🐷🐷
Humour🐷🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷🐷🐷

Captain America: Brave New World

Rating: 2

Will Marvel’s current Phase Meh ever end?


Storytelling🐷
Characters🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷
Fun🐷
Humour🐷🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷
Originality🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷

Nosferatu

Rating: 2.5

A world where Mark Gatiss’ and Steven Moffat’s Dracula (2020) exists does not need such an unironically forced adaptation like this uneven paced snoozefest that simultaneously tries so hard to be and not to be Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992).

#NotMyFeratu


Storytelling🐷
Characters🐷🐷
Acting🐷🐷
Drama, Baby!🐷🐷
Fun🐷
Humour🐷
Visuals🐷🐷🐷
Music and Sound🐷🐷🐷
Originality🐷🐷
Entertainment value🐷🐷
Production value🐷🐷🐷
Satisfaction🐷🐷

Das Fleischkäse-Emoji

Mein Special aus dem Jahr 2018 zu Herkunft und Eigenheiten des Phänomens Emoji ist auf Blick.ch leider nicht mehr abrufbar. Als Service an der interessierten Öffentlichkeit präsentiere ich das faszinierende Stück Trivia darum jetzt exklusiv auf meiner eigenen Plattform:

Auf der Webseite finden sich umfassende Informationen zur Entstehung und Entwicklung von Emojis, angefangen bei ihrer Einführung in Japan im Jahr 1999 durch NTT DoCoMo bis hin zur internationalen Standardisierung durch Unicode im Jahr 2010. Sie erläutert die technischen Hintergründe von Unicode, die unterschiedlichen Darstellungsvarianten und Modifikatoren von Emojis, sowie deren Nutzung und Anpassung auf verschiedenen Plattformen. Ausserdem werden kontroverse Symbole und deren gesellschaftliche Auswirkungen beleuchtet, wie beispielsweise Änderungen bei Waffen-Emojis. Die Webseite bietet somit einen detaillierten Überblick über die Geschichte und technische Umsetzung von Emojis.

Viel Spass beim Erkunden.